According to the BBC, “the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) is calling on high street books to pull a Tintin adventure from its shelves over claims it is racist.”
I’m genuinely not sure how I feel about this. On one hand, many of the Tintin books encompass the worst of colonialist bigotry; on the other, “the book’s publishers Egmont said the book comes with a warning that it features ‘bourgeois, paternalistic stereotypes of the period – an interpretation some readers may find offensive.’” So, the edition in question contains printed acknowledgement of the offensive contents and isn’t attempting to excuse them, which casts the issue in a somewhat different light.
Where do you draw that line? Is there a clear line at all? Should the book be relegated to the “adult” section? Should stores even carry it? Is there an ethical difference between what content should be tolerated in Tintin, which is considered a seminal and canonical piece of comics literature, versus other, less “classic” works? Should there be?
“Holding Out for a Hero”
Youtube link to a video of drag queen Tandi Iman Dupree performing Betty Taylor’s “Holding Out for a Hero” – recently(ish) popularized by SHREK 2 – dressed as Wonder Woman and joined by a Superman dancer.
I’m kind of in love with this video and could ramble about the interesting things it says (without even trying!) about conventional ideas of sexuality, race, and identity for hours, but instead I think I’ll just link you to it, because it’s fantastic and says it all without any input from me.
Also, it’s sexy beyond belief.